Tradeoffs in anti-scatter grid for energy-resolved photon counting detector

Yannan Jin, Geng Fu, Xue Rui, Peter M. Edic

DOI:10.12059/Fully3D.2017-11-3105004

Published in:Fully3D 2017 Proceedings

Pages:602-606

Keywords:
photon-counting detector, anti-scatter grid, material decomposition, Cramér-Rao lower bound
The goal of this study is to investigate the tradeoff in the design of anti-scatter grid for a photon-counting detector. The anti-scatter grid can block the primary beam at the boundary of each detector pixel, which reduces the charge sharing. On the other hand, thick anti-scatter grids also reduce the detector fill factor and thus reduce dose efficiency. To quantitatively evaluate the performance of spectral imaging, we use both CRLB-based metrics from analytic calculation and CNR-based metrics from projection-based simulation. The results indicate that the use of anti-scatter grid can reduce the charge sharing, but its dose penalty in geometric efficiency outweighs the dose benefit in spectral separation. Therefore, thinner anti-scatter grid plates are preferred for photon-counting detectors in both single-energy and spectral imaging.
Yannan Jin
GE Global Research
Geng Fu
GE Global Research
Xue Rui
GE Global Research
Peter M. Edic
GE Global Research
  1. Taguchi, Katsuyuki, and Jan S. Iwanczyk. "Vision 20/20: Single photon counting x-ray detectors in medical imaging." Medical physics 40.10 (2013): 100901.
  2. Wang, Xiaolan, et al. "Material separation in x-ray CT with energy resolved photon-counting detectors." Medical physics 38.3 (2011): 1534-1546.
  3. Schlomka, JPea, et al. "Experimental feasibility of multi-energy photon-counting K-edge imaging in pre-clinical computed tomography." Physics in medicine and biology 53.15 (2008): 4031.
  4. Barber, William C., et al. "Characterization of a novel photon counting detector for clinical CT: count rate, energy resolution, and noise performance." SPIE Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2009.
  5. Knoll, Glenn F. Radiation detection and measurement. John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
  6. Hsieh, Scott S. and Norbert J. Pelc. “Pixel Size Tradeoffs for CdTe Spectral Photon Counting Detectors.” 4th International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography. CT-meeting, 2016.
  7. Jin, Yannan, et al. " Design and Optimization of Direct Conversion Photon-Counting Detector for Dual-Energy CT Imaging." 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC). IEEE, 2016.
  8. Jin, Yannan, et al. “CNR Analysis of Dual Energy Technologies.” 3rd International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography. CT-meeting, 2014.
  9. Kappler, S., et al. "Dual-energy performance of dual kVp in comparison to dual-layer and quantum-counting CT system concepts." SPIE Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2009.
  10. Roessl, E., and C. Herrmann. "Cramér–Rao lower bound of basis image noise in multiple-energy x-ray imaging." Physics in medicine and biology 54.5 (2009): 1307.
  11. Wang, Adam S., and Norbert J. Pelc. "Sufficient statistics as a generalization of binning in spectral x-ray imaging." IEEE transactions on medical imaging 30.1 (2011): 84-93.
  12. Petschke, Adam, and Yu Zou. "An analytical formula for the covariance matrix of basis material projection estimates in spectral x-ray computed tomography." Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), 2015 IEEE. IEEE, 2015.
  13. R. E. Alvarez and A. Macovski, "Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerised tomography," Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 21, pp. 733-744, 1976.
  14. Koenig, Thomas, et al. "Charge summing in spectroscopic x-ray detectors with high-Z sensors." IEEE Transactions