Simple and efficient raycasting on modern GPU’s read-and-write memory for fast forward projections in iterative CBCT reconstruction

Jonas Dittmann, Randolf Hanke

DOI:10.12059/Fully3D.2017-11-3203040

Published in: Fully3D 2017 Proceedings

Pages:781-784

Keywords:
Forward projection of 3D voxel volumes (“X-ray transform”) is one of the central and computation intensive tasks of all iterative tomographic reconstruction algorithms. It is typically implemented using ray driven algorithms such as the often cited Siddon’s algorithm, traversing a voxel volume along connecting lines between X-ray source and detector.
While the texture units of Graphical Processing Units (GPUs) dedicated to fast read-only random memory accesses have long been employed for tomographic reconstruction, their performance advantage cannot be fully utilized in iterative techniques which inherently require steady read-and-write memory accesses to the to-be-reconstructed volume.
With the objective of accelerating iterative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) reconstruction methods operating solely on read-and-write GPU main memory (RAM), a branchless 3D generalization of Joseph’s projection algorithm is presented that is both highly efficient on GPU RAM and easy to implement.
The presented raycasting algorithm is benchmarked on a recent consumer grade GPU and compared to a DDA algorithm (equivalent to Siddon’s). It outperforms the latter both with respect to memory access rate (factor 3.5) as well as total run time both on GPU RAM and texture memory (factor 1.2). At about 600 (740) GB/s of memory access rate, it computes over 350 (450) projections of a 5123 voxel volume per second on main memory (texture memory).
Jonas Dittmann
Lehrstuhl fuer Roentgenmikroskopie, Universitaet Wuerzburg, Germany
Randolf Hanke
Lehrstuhl fuer Roentgenmikroskopie, Universitaet Wuerzburg and Fraunhofer IIS, Germany
  1. R. L. Siddon, “Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a threedimensional CT array,” Medical Physics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 252–255, 1985.
  2. R. H. Huesman, G. T. Gullberg, W. L. Greenberg, and T. F. Budinger, RECLBL Library Users Manual – Donner Algorithms for Reconstruction Tomography, 1977.
  3. J. Amanatides and A. Woo, “A Fast Voxel Traversal Algorithm for Ray Tracing,” Eurogrpahics, vol. 87, no. 3, p. 10, 1987. [Online]. Available: http://www.cse.chalmers.se/edu/year/2015/course/TDA361/grid.pdf
  4. S. B. Lo, “Strip and Line Path Integrals with a Square Pixel Matrix: A Unified Theory for Computational CT Projections,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 355–363, 1988.
  5. W. Yao and K. Leszczynski, “Analytically derived weighting factors for transmission tomography cone beam projections,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 13–533, 2009.
  6. K. M. Hanson and G. W. Wecksung, “Local basis-function approach to computed tomography,” Applied Optics, vol. 24, no. 23, pp. 4028–4039, 1985.
  7. R. M. Lewitt, “Alternatives to voxels for image representation in iterative roconstruction algorithms,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 705–716, 1992.
  8. P. M. Joseph, “An Improved Algorithms for Reprojecting Rays Through Pixel Images,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. MI-1, no. 3, pp. 192–196, 1982.
  9. B. De Man and S. Basu, “Distance-driven projection and backprojection in three dimensions,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 2463–2475, 2004.
  10. C. Schretter, “A Fast Tube-of-Response Raytracer,” Medical Physics, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 4744–4748, 2006.
  11. F. Xu and K. Mueller, “Accelerating Popular Tomographic Reconstruction Algorithms on Commodity PC Graphics Hardware,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 654–663, 2005.
  12. K. Xiao, D. Z. Chen, X. S. Hu, and B. Zhou, “Efficient implementation of the 3D-DDA ray traversal algorithm on GPU and its application in radiation dose calculation ,” Medical Physics, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 7619–7625, December 2012.
  13. W. M. Thompson and W. R. B. Lionheart, “GPU Accelerated Structure-Exploiting Matched Forward and Back Projection for Algebraic Iterative. Cone Beam CT Reconstruction,” The Third International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography, pp. 355–358, June 2014.
  14. J. Sunnegårdh and P. Danielsson, “A New Anti-Aliased Projection Operator for Iterative CT Reconstruction,” 2007.